Unvibe Teams · Founding pilot

Share understanding as the team grows.

Start with a shared workspace and who-reviewed-what. GitHub-connected intelligence is next, and stays clearly labeled Pilot until it ships.

Unvibe Teams · Founding pilot

Share a workspace. See who reviewed what.

Founding Teams today is a shared workspace with invites and a who-reviewed-what activity feed. Full explanation text stays on each person’s device. GitHub-connected intelligence is Pilot — not shipped yet.

  • Shared workspaceCreate a team, invite seats, and work in one place.
  • Who reviewed whatSee who understood which file, concept, and project.
  • GitHub intelligencePR walkthroughs and knowledge-risk dashboards stay Pilot.
TEAM ACTIVITYSHIPPED IN PILOT
maya@2h ago

understood auth middleware

jon@yesterday

reviewed billing plans.ts

alex@yesterday

needs review on sync.ts

GitHub intelligencePILOT

Illustrative activity feed. PR dashboards and knowledge-risk scores are not current claims.

A measured rollout

One useful layer at a time.

The personal product remains the developer wedge. Teams starts with shared activity, then adds GitHub intelligence only when it is real — never as a silent claim.

Available now

Share the platform

Create a team workspace, invite teammates, and see who reviewed or understood which file, concept, and project. Explanation text stays on each device.

  • Team workspace and invites
  • Who-reviewed-what activity feed
  • Authorship on shared metadata
Pilot

Connect GitHub next

Repository connection, PR walkthroughs, and transparent knowledge-risk signals are labeled Pilot. They are not included in the founding workspace today.

  • Organization and repository connection
  • PR understanding
  • Coverage, freshness, and Understanding Gap
Planned

Act on the next gap

Project-native recommendations that point to a real PR, architecture path, concept, or repository walkthrough — after the GitHub layer ships.

  • Engineering onboarding
  • Weekly knowledge brief
  • Ask Engineering and architecture context

Evidence, not surveillance

Understanding coverage is not employee performance.

Commit activity can establish familiarity, but it never proves comprehension. When GitHub intelligence ships, scores will use explicit evidence, show why a number moved, and say “Not enough data” when the evidence is thin.

Every future Teams metric must:
  • Expose its contributing evidence and weights.
  • Separate source evidence from AI inference.
  • Avoid leaderboards and “good/bad engineer” labels.
  • Handle loading, missing-data, error, and insufficient-evidence states.

Enterprise roadmap

Governance comes after the useful foundation.

Organization intelligence, policies, permissions, audit events, and retention controls are planned. SSO/SAML, SCIM, BYOK, VPC deployment, data residency, and SLA support are later-stage capabilities — not current claims.